The appealing system makes it possible for administrative litigation to deal with disputes between university and its faculty members. However, the limitations of the existing laws prevent a large number of disputes from administrative litigation. Reviews of selected disputes turn out too much freedom yet too little fairness. Reviewing the appealing decisions is not conducive to mediate disputes. It's suggested that appealing should be taken as a procedure prior to administrative litigation, considering the uniqueness of university management. Any disputes that are related to faculty members' basic rights and are as a result of university management should be included in administrative litigation. For reviewing standards, both procedural and entity reviews should be applied for university's unilateral contract termination, dismissal and other administrative sanctions; both formal and procedural reviews should be applied for professional working evaluations; experts' review should be taken when it comes to academic cases, for instance, to determine whether a faculty member is eligible for an academic title.