惩戒权之适用对象相对论
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


The Application Objects Theory of Disciplinary Power
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    惩戒权的适用对象应当受到严格限制:一是非职业行为即私人行为不能纳入惩戒权的范畴;二 是惩戒不能妨碍社会保障权的实现。惩戒权的适用对象,应当特别注意区分党员劳动者与非党员劳动者:党员 劳动者之非职业行为应纳入惩戒的范围;而非党员劳动者之非职业行为则不能。党员劳动者非职业行为之惩戒 依据不能是单位内部规章或纪律,而只能是党规党纪。对党员劳动者非职业行为惩戒应当实行单罚,而不能实 行双罚。用人单位行使惩戒权,不得剥夺或减少劳动者之社会保障待遇。

    Abstract:

    The application objects of disciplinary power should be strictly limited: first, the non-professional behavior that private behavior cannot be included in the scope of disciplinary power; second, the punishment can not hinder the realization of social security rights. Referring to the boundary of disciplinary power, we should pay special attention to distinguish between Party members and non-Party members: the non-professional behavior of Party members shall be included in the scope of punishment; but the non-Party members should not. The disciplinary basis of nonparty workers occupation behavior is not internal rules or discipline, but is only the party rules and the party discipline, such as "the Disciplinary Regulations of the Communist Party of China". The disciplinary punishment of the non-professional behavior of the party members should practice single punishment, but not double punishment. The employing unit should not deprive or reduce the social security benefits of the laborers.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

问清泓.惩戒权之适用对象相对论[J].中国劳动关系学院,2017,31(5):69-75.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-09-27
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码