利益争议处理中调解组织和机制的十国比较
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


International Comparison of Mediation Organizations and Mechanisms in Interest Dispute Resolution
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    代替性纠纷解决方式(ADR)中的调解制度作为调整劳动关系、解决劳资矛盾的核心制度,其重 要性日益凸显。而我国现行的利益争议调解机制尚未成熟,有待转型。目前此领域的研究多是针对外国国情, 无法为我国转型提供思路。本文从国外的调解制度比较研究中借鉴比较方法,选取十个与我国有着相似经历的 转型中国家和调解制度完善的发达国家,对比其调解组织和制度的特点。基于我国国情,为我国调解制度改革 提出提升立法层次、完善成员设置和任命制度等政策建议。

    Abstract:

    The mediation system of the Alternative Dispute Resolution is becoming more and more important as the core system to adjust the labor relations and solve the contradiction between labor and capital. However, the current mediation mechanism of interest disputes in China is not yet mature and needs to be transformed. At present, the research in this field is mostly aimed at foreign national conditions, which can not provide ideas for China's transformation. Therefore, this paper draws on the comparative method from the comparative study of foreign mediation system, and then selects some developed countries with similar experiences in China and the developed countries with perfect mediation system, then to study their mediation characteristics. Finally, based on China's national conditions, sum up the experience of other countries for the reform of China's mediation system, such as raising the level of legislation, improving the membership setting and appointment of policy recommendations.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

宋 湛,刘怡然.利益争议处理中调解组织和机制的十国比较[J].中国劳动关系学院,2018,32(1):28-35.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-05-19
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
你可能在找: | | | | | | | | |