劳动关系视角下的网约用工纠纷研究
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Labor Disputes of Net Appointment Workers from the Perspective of Labor Relations
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    近年来,网络平台与网约工的劳动纠纷开始显现在司法实务中。面对类似纠纷,法院采取了不 同的立场。尽管网约用工打破了过去“单一企业对应单一员工”的劳动关系模式,但根据现行法律,仅凭合作 协议难以认定网络平台与网约工存在劳动关系。一方面应当区分网约工与网络平台签订劳动合同、网络平台与 其它企业进行合作、网络平台直接与网约工签订合作协议三种形式,另一方面应当在司法实践中对“各项劳动 规章制度适用”、“受劳动管理”、“从事用人单位安排的有报酬的劳动”进行统一规范解释。最后应当在司 法经验基础上根据“互联网 +”背景下共享经济的特点完善劳动法。

    Abstract:

    In recent years, the labor disputes between the network platform and the net appointment workers begin to appear in the judicial practice. In the face of similar disputes, the court took a different stance. Although the labor relationship model of "single enterprise corresponds to a single employee" has been broken by the employment of network, according to the existing law, it is difficult to identify the labor relationship between the network platform and the network contractor only by the cooperation agreement. On the one hand, we should distinguish about net appointment workers sign labor contracts with network platforms, network platform cooperation with other companies and the network platform signed a cooperation agreement with net appointment workers directly in three forms. On the other hand shall be in the judicial practice of "the labor regulations", "labor management", "engaged in the employer arrange the paid labor" standardized interpretation. Finally, on the basis of the experience in the judicial shall according to the “Internet plus" under the background of the sharing economy characteristics of perfecting labor law.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

金 超.劳动关系视角下的网约用工纠纷研究[J].中国劳动关系学院,2018,32(2):31-38.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-05-19
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
你可能在找: | | | | | | | | |