集体协商的工资效应与非工资效应研究 —— 基于中国雇主—雇员匹配数据
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


A Study into the Wage Effect and Non-wage Effect of Collective Negotiations: A Case Study into China's Employer-Employee Matching Data
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    研究基于中国雇主—雇员匹配数据追踪调查(2013),通过对工资、津贴等现金性收入和劳动 安全保障等与工作环境相关的非工资因素分别进行 OLS 和有序 Probit 回归,检验集体合同的工资效应和非工资 效应。结果显示,集体合同的签订对员工工资和津贴等现金性收入的影响并不显著,对劳动安全保障和卫生条 件等非工资性因素均呈显著正相关关系。在集体协商的推行过程中,应避免流于形式,改变重“合同数量”轻“合 同质量”的单一指标化管理模式,在改善员工工作环境等非工资效应的同时也应关注如何有效提高集体协商的 工资效应。

    Abstract:

    This paper, based on China's Employer-Employee Match Data (of 2013) as well as OLS ordered prohibit regression analysis made on cash income factors of wage and allowance, and non-wage factors of labor safety and security, tests the wage effect and non-wage effect of collective negotiation. Results of the study show that while the wage effect of collective negotiation is insignificant, the non-wage effect associated with working conditions is significantly positive; and the implementation of collective negotiation, other than employees' wage, did not have significant effect on their revenue, just making considerable improvement on employees' workplace environment instead. In the process of collective negotiation implementation, thus, emphasis should be laid on improving on both the employees' wage effect and the non-wage effect of workplace environment, instead of sticking to mere formality of focusing on "the quantity" rather than "the quality" of contracts.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

陈晓菲,李齐,杨伟国.集体协商的工资效应与非工资效应研究 —— 基于中国雇主—雇员匹配数据[J].中国劳动关系学院,2018,32(3):35-43.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-05-22
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
你可能在找: | | | | | | | | |