The efficiency system of the industrial labor dispute mediation is an important aspect affecting its use of opportunities and effects. The key to the efficiency value lies in its convergence of industry labor dispute mediation with judicial confirmation and labor arbitration review. According to the existent normative system, problems such as procedural legal confusion, lack of legal justification, and differing review standards arise due to differences in the performance of the two sets of mechanisms for judicial confirmation and arbitration review. Thus, the arrangement of parallel rules in judicial confirmation detracts from the efficiency value of the industry-based labor dispute mediation system. These issues are closely related to the fragmentation of legislation and the unclear positioning of procedural values. To solve the above problems, homogenization of the procedures, as a result, should be introduced as the basic orientation of problem-solving, reforming the status quo of decentralized legislation and low levels of order, accelerating the transformation of the judicial confirmation process of "dualization" to a "universalization". Thus, the consistency of judicial confirmation and labor arbitration review standards and the revision process value can be achieved.