Abstract:The Trade Union Law sets up an administrative relief path for disputes over improper labor practices in the section of "Legal Liabilities". However, to date, the nature and rules of this path have not yet been clearly defi ned, seriously restricting the implementation of the law. Three disposal modes of this type of dispute exist in out-of-domain legislation: civil litigation domination, administrative adjudication domination, and dual mechanisms coexistence. However, due to the non-appealability of disputes over improper labor practices, difficulty of judicial relief to meet the timeliness and preventative requirements of the right of association protection, and the wider range of subjects who can participate in administrative relief, administrative adjudication has always taken up a core position in representing the legislative state mechanism. Based on the design of a multi-value appeal mechanism, China should draw on this legislative experience and promote the legal continuation in terms of the basic structure of administrative adjudication for disputes over improper labor practices, coordination between provisions of wrongful dismissal due to improper labor practices and general wrongful dismissal provisions, and the expansion of administrative relief paths for union staff's improper labor practices. Furthermore, this should also lead to the improvement of relevant legislation. In the future, it is suggested to formulate an overarching "Labor Dispute Processing Law" to systematically reorganize the handling of collective labor disputes, including disputes over improper labor practices, and ultimately form a labor dispute system with Chinese characteristics.